A comprehensive guide outlines the main differences between Databricks Delta Live Tables (DLT) and a standard data pipeline in areas like automation, scalability, management, and usability.
Delta Live Tables (DLT)
Delta Live Tables (DLT) is a Databricks framework designed to create and keep reliable data pipelines. It uses Delta Lake for production-grade processes and simplifies ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) with SQL or Python code.
Key Features
- Declarative Pipeline Definition:
- Define data transformations and dependencies using SQL or Python.
- DLT automatically manages the execution order.
- Automated Data Quality Checks:
- Built-in support for expectations (data quality rules).
- Alerts or error handling for data anomalies.
- Simplified Orchestration:
- No need to explicitly manage tasks or dependencies.
- DLT takes care of job execution, retries, and failures.
- Optimized for Delta Lake:
- DLT works directly with Delta Lake for ACID compliance, time travel, and scalable storage.
- Versioning and Change Tracking:
- Tracks changes in schema and data.
- Schema evolution is managed automatically.
- Monitoring and Observability:
- Real-time monitoring of pipeline performance and data quality in the Databricks UI.
~Affiliate
Normal Data Pipeline
A normal data pipeline is a custom implementation of ETL/ELT processes using various tools or code (e.g., Apache Spark, Python, SQL, Airflow, etc.). These pipelines can be more flexible but need more manual setup and maintenance.
Key Features
- Manual Orchestration:
- Use tools like Airflow, Luigi, or Databricks Jobs to manage tasks and dependencies.
- Explicitly define the sequence of operations.
- Custom Code:
- Developers write custom logic for data ingestion, transformation, and loading.
- High flexibility but requires more effort for development and testing.
- Data Quality Management:
- Manual implementation of data validation and quality checks.
- No built-in system for expectations.
- Scalability:
- Pipelines can be scaled, but developers must optimize jobs and resources.
- Monitoring:
- Requires external monitoring tools or custom logging solutions.
- Less integrated compared to DLT.
- Maintenance:
- Requires manual updates for schema changes, error handling, and performance tuning.
Comparison Table
| Aspect | Delta Live Tables (DLT) | Normal Data Pipeline |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | Declarative; minimal coding. | Requires custom coding and orchestration. |
| Data Quality | Built-in expectations and validation. | Manual implementation required. |
| Orchestration | Automated task management. | Manual or using orchestration tools. |
| Monitoring | Real-time in Databricks UI. | External tools or custom setup. |
| Scalability | Optimized for Delta Lake; scalable out-of-box. | Requires developer effort to scale. |
| Schema Evolution | Handled automatically. | Manual handling of schema changes. |
| Performance Optimization | Built-in optimization for Delta Lake. | Developer-managed tuning. |
| Use Case | Simplifying production-grade pipelines. | Full control and customization needed. |
When to Use Delta Live Tables
- Quick Deployment: When you need to quickly deploy pipelines with minimal coding.
- Reliable Data Processing: If maintaining data quality and schema consistency is critical.
- Integration with Databricks: Ideal if you already use Databricks and Delta Lake.
When to Use Normal Pipelines
- Flexibility: When you need custom logic or work outside the Delta Lake ecosystem.
- Existing Infrastructure: If your organization uses different orchestration or data storage systems.
- Non-Databricks Pipelines: If your pipeline spans systems that aren’t integrated with Databricks.
Delta Live Tables is often the better choice if you’re already using Databricks and Delta Lake. It excels due to its simplicity, integration, and automation. However, normal pipelines offer more flexibility for more complex, cross-platform workflows. Let me know your use case, and I can guide you further!
Srinimf 